Cage/Count supervisor
AI Exposure Rank
42/100
Range 35–50/100 across source-weight sensitivity checks
Cage/Count supervisor has an AI Exposure Rank of 42/100, meaning its work is more exposed to current AI capabilities than approximately 42% of Singapore occupations. The evidence currently points to workflow redesign; this is a relative rank, not a probability of job loss.
Service & Sales Workers·SGD 4,484/mo (4,140–4,817)·~15.1K workers in SG·Updated 2026-06-11
Relative AI exposure, not a prediction of job loss. Hiring, wages and role design depend on many forces this rank does not forecast.
Why This Score
42% of tasks overlap with current AI
10% human advantage from judgment & presence
57% demand buffer from the local labour market
AI usage 36pp above theoretical exposure
These factors interact with each other — the final score is not a simple sum of these bars.
The evidence behind this occupation's AI exposure, with human-work and demand context shown separately. Score stability: watch. How this works
Tasks AI can handle
With 42% AI task overlap (based on Felten AIOE, Anthropic Economic Index, Eloundou GPT exposure, and ILO occupational exposure), the Cage/Count supervisor tasks most exposed include: reservation management, menu recommendations, order processing, loyalty program tracking, and basic customer query handling via chatbots.
- • Advise customers on use and care of merchandise.
- • Provide information about rental items, such as availability, operation, or description.
- • Recommend and provide advice on a wide variety of products and services.
O*NET tasks for this occupation with the most observed AI usage (Anthropic task data).
What AI can't do here
At 10% human bottleneck protection, the tasks that remain hardest to automate for Cage/Count supervisor include: genuine hospitality and warmth, reading customer moods, handling complaints gracefully, creating memorable experiences, and adapting service to cultural expectations.
Main insulation channels: Relational work + Non-routine work — the work-context dimensions behind this occupation's human bottleneck.
Skills to focus on
Brynjolfsson et al. (2023) found customer service agents using AI saw +14% productivity, with the biggest gains among junior workers — AI compressed the experience gap.
Sources: Felten AIOE (2021), Anthropic Economic Index (2026), Eloundou GPT Exposure (Science, 2024), ILO GenAI (2025), Pizzinelli et al. bottleneck model. Full methodology.
Singapore Now
Current labour market conditions and how they affect this role.
Cooling, but not collapsing. Vacancies are softer, yet retrenchment remains low and hiring still exceeds resignations.
Vacancy
3.1%
↓ 11.4% YoY
Hiring
2.6%
vs 1.6% resign
Retrenchment
1.5
per 1,000 · low
Re-entry
78.5%
find work in 12mo· -1.6pp
Clerical, Sales & Service Workers · 2025 Q4
Top Industries
Industry vacancy overlays use the latest published detailed cross-tab, which can lag the main labour monitor.
What You Can Do
Cage/Count supervisor has some offset potential, but it depends on transition pathways holding up in practice and on workers clearing the main switching frictions.
Published transition support
Related roles you could transition to
Exposure-reducingHigher AI exposure, but comparatively credible exposure-reducing moves exist — the strongest scores 68% match. Escape-route quality and labour demand matter alongside exposure.
Compare within Service & Sales Workers
See how this compares to similar occupations
Compare with... →Classification
More exposed than approximately 42% of occupations · V8 AI Exposure Rank· GCE O-Level / Secondary
Raw scores
AIOE -0.248 · θ 0.602 · C-AIOE -0.219
Stability
watch · Optimistic 22% · Pessimistic 35%
Score range (best/worst case)
Exposure sensitivity 31–52% · Rank sensitivity 35–50/100 across source-weight sensitivity checks
Scoring basis
V8 AI Exposure Rank. A relative Singapore occupation index. It ranks AI task exposure; it is not a probability of job loss or a percentage of tasks.
Wage range (SGD/mo)
25th 4,140 · Median 4,484 · 75th 4,817
Evidence & sources
Data matching
direct · SSOC 52301
Real-world AI usage: +36% vs estimated
Data quality
medium evidence · 4 exposure sources · direct mapping
Capped at high · Final rating: medium · capped for conflicting signals
100% weighted task match · 24% effective coverage
AI overlap by data source
Weights: aioe 24% · anthropic 26% · eloundou 25% · ilo 26%
Conflicting data signals
Tools & offset factors
What helps
- Nearby moves and published transition support look reasonably strong.
What could slow it down
- Current demand support is thin, so offsets may take longer to show up.
Worker profile & local context
- Vacancy rate is 3.1% and fell by 0.2 points from last quarter.
- Hiring read: recruitment is running above resignation (2.6% vs 1.6%).
- Retrenchment was low at 1.5 per 1,000 employees.
- 78.5% of retrenched workers re-entered employment within 12 months.
Worker profile
Gender mix
39% male / 61% femalePublished Singapore worker composition for the detailed occupation family 52 Sales Workers.
Employment structure
Employee-heavy91% employees, 9% employers or self-employed workers.
Work arrangement
Part-time meaningful24% part-time and 76% full-time in 2025.
Age profile
Older-skewing17% aged 15 to 29, 32% aged 30 to 49, and 51% aged 50 or older.
Qualification mix
Non-degree heavySecondary 26%; Post-secondary 25%.
Gross wage by sex
Near parityPublished June 2024 gross wage medians: male $4,538, female $4,447.
Where this work is concentrated
Top planning areas
Woodlands, Tampines, Yishun22% of workers in this occupation group live in these three planning areas.
Residential concentration
Moderately clustered35% live across the top five planning areas in the 2020 Census.
Commute pattern
Mid-range commutesEstimated average commute 33.8 minutes. 28% take 46 minutes or more.
Role profile
How this role's work breaks down across key dimensions. This is a general profile, not an individual measurement.
Workflow dimensions (0 = low, 1 = high)
How this changes by career stage
Career stage can change the task mix and human context. These directional profiles are illustrative, not occupation-level forecasts of hiring or displacement.
Frequently asked questions
Will AI replace Cage/Count supervisor?
Cage/Count supervisor has an AI Exposure Rank of 42/100, meaning its work is more exposed to current AI capabilities than approximately 42% of Singapore occupations. The evidence currently points to workflow redesign; this is a relative rank, not a probability of job loss. AI Exposure Rank: 42/100 (Moderate). Median wage: SGD 4,484/month.
What is the AI exposure rank for Cage/Count supervisor?
Cage/Count supervisor has an AI Exposure Rank of 42/100, rated Moderate. It ranks higher than approximately 42% of Singapore occupations for exposure to current AI capabilities; it is not a job-loss probability.
What career transitions are available for Cage/Count supervisor?
Cage/Count supervisor has modeled transition pathways to related occupations. The strongest adjacent pathway is Salesperson (door-to-door), based on skill and wage similarity (model-estimated). Transition scoring accounts for wage preservation, training ease, and destination quality.
How does Cage/Count supervisor salary compare in the live market?
Cage/Count supervisor earns a median gross wage of SGD 4,484/month in the live market (25th-75th percentile: SGD 4,140-4,817). This is near median across all 562 scored occupations, and 50% above group median within Service & Sales Workers occupations.